Compromiso cívico y actitudes de los universitarios hacia el gobierno abierto

  • Andrés Caballero Quintana Universidad de las Palmas de Gran Canaria (España)
  • Agustín Sánchez Medina Universidad de las Palmas de Gran Canaria (España)
  • Jesús Bernardino Alonso Hernández Universidad de las Palmas de Gran Canaria (España)


Resumen Este trabajo analiza los conceptos de actitud, compromiso cívico y gobierno abierto para explorar si existe relación entre quiénes manifiestan mayor compromiso cívico entre los universitarios, con una mayor predisposición para favorecer el Gobierno Abierto como modelo deseable de gestión pública, cuya base sobre Internet (open data, servicios web, etc.) y principios gerenciales (información, participación y colaboración) más se alinean con las preferencias de los millenials. También se investiga si las actitudes políticas de participación de los universitarios median entre el compromiso político y el Gobierno Abierto. Tras realizar una encuesta a 435 universitarios, los resultados del modelo estructural propuesto sustentan dichas relaciones. Este trabajo aporta así nuevos datos sobre la percepción y preferencias hacia este modelo de gobierno por los universitarios millenials, quiénes son objeto de debate en relación a su grado de compromiso cívico respecto anteriores generaciones.

Biografía del autor

Andrés Caballero Quintana, Universidad de las Palmas de Gran Canaria (España)
El Dr. D. Andrés Caballero Quintana es profesor Asociado a la Universidad de Las Palmas de Gran Canaria. Investigador del Instituto Universitario de Ciencias y Tecnologías Cibernéticas, División de Empresa, Tecnología, Comportamiento y Sociedad. Campus de Tafira (Las Palmas de Gran Canaria) - Parque Científico-Tecnológico de la ULPGC. Y Técnico Superior del Ayuntamiento de Las Palmas.
Agustín Sánchez Medina, Universidad de las Palmas de Gran Canaria (España)
Dr. D. Agustín Sánchez Medina es profesor de la Universidad de Las Palmas de Gran Canaria. Secretario e Investigador del Investigador del Instituto Universitario de Ciencias y Tecnologías Cibernéticas, División de Empresa, Tecnología, Comportamiento y Sociedad. Campus de Tafira (Las Palmas de Gran Canaria) - Parque Científico-Tecnológico
Jesús Bernardino Alonso Hernández, Universidad de las Palmas de Gran Canaria (España)
El Dr. D. Jesús Bernardino Alonso Hernández es profesor de la Universidad de Las Palmas de Gran Canaria. Investigador del Instituto Universitario para el Desarrollo Tecnológico y la Innovación en Comunicaciones. Campus de Tafira (Las Palmas de Gran Canaria) - Parque Científico-Tecnológico de la ULPGC.


Agroskin, D., Jonas, E. & Traut-Mattausch, E., 2014. When Suspicious Minds Go Political: Distrusting and Justifying the System at the Same Time. Political Psychology, xx(xx), pp.1–33. Available at:
Andolina, M. et al., 2003. A guide to the index of civic and political engagement. Knowledge Creation Diffusion Utilization, 0, pp.0–18. Available at:
Anon, Falk, Miller (1992) A Primer for Soft Modeling.
Appleton, J. J., Christenson, S. L., & Furlong, M., 2008. Student engagement with school: Critical conceptual and methodological issues of the construct. Psychology in Schools, 45, pp.369–386.
Autio, E. et al., 2001. Entrepreneurial Intent among Students in Scandinavia and in the USA. Enterprise and Innovation Management Studies, 2(2), pp.145–160.
Banisar, D., 2006. Freedom of Information around the World 2006: A global survey of access to Government Record Laws., London: London: Privacy International.
Barclay, D., Higgins, C. & Thompson, R., 1995. The Partial Least Squares (PLS). Approach to causal modeling: personal computer adoption and use as an illustration. Technology studies, 2(2), pp.285–309.
Bellver, A. & Kaufmann, D., 2005. Transparenting transparency: Initial empirics and policy applications. World Bank Policy Research Working Paper, pp.1–73. Available at:
Best, H. y M.C., 2000. Parliamentary Representatives in Europe 1848-2000 H. y M. C. Best, ed., Oxford.
Birchall, C., 2015. “”: Delimiting transparency. European Journal of Social Theory, 18(2), pp.185–202. Available at:
Birchall, C., 2014. Radical Transparency? Cultural Studies ↔ Critical Methodologies, 14(1), pp.77–88. Available at:
Brett, P. & Thomas, D., 2014. Discovering Argument : Linking Literacy , Citizenship Education , and Persuasive Advocacy. Journal of Social Science Education, 13(4), pp.66–77.
Caprara, G. et al., 2003. Personalities of politicians and voters: unique and synergistic relationships. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 84(4), pp.849–856.
Caprara, G.V. & Schwartz, S., 2006. Personality and Politics : Values , Traits , and. , 27(1).
Carmines, E. & Zeller, R., 1979. Reliability and validity assessment, London: SAGE.
Chin, W.W., 1998. Issues and opinion on structural equation modeling. MIS Quarterly.
Clark, D., 1996. Open government in Britain: Discourse and practice. Public Money & Management, 16(1), pp.23–30.
Coglianese, C., 2009. The transparency president? The Obama administration and open government. Governance, 22(4), pp.529–544. Available at:
Coller, X. et. al., 2011. Datos básicos de los políticos autonómicos. Perfil social de los parlamentarios. Available at:
Coller, X. et. al., 2012. La educación de nuestros políticos. EL PAIS. Available at:
Cronbach, L.J., 1971. Test validation. In R. Thorndike, ed. Educational measurement. Washington, DC: American Council on Education, pp. 443–507.
Curtin, Deirdre, and A.J.M., 2006. Does transparency strengthen legitimacy? Information policy, 11 (2), pp.109–23.
Denault, A. S., & Poulin, F. (2009)., 2009. Predictors of adolescent participation in organized activity. Journal of Research on Adolescence, 19, pp.287–311.
Dworkin, R., 1977. Open government or closed? New society. In I. Galnoor, ed. Government Secrecy in Democracies. New York.: Harper and Row, pp. 679–680.
Eccles, J. S., & Wang, M. (2012)., 2012. Part I commentary: So what is student engagement anyway? In & C. W. (Eds. . S. L. Christenson, A. L. Reschly, ed. Handbook of research on student engagement. New York, NY: Springer, pp. 133–145.
Esaiasson, P. & Persson, M., 2014. Does Studying Political Science Affect Civic Attitudes?: A Panel Comparison of Students of Politics, Law, and Mass Communication. Journal of Political Science Education, 10(4), pp.375–385. Available at:
Evans, H.K. & Ulbig, S., 2012. Social Butterflies and Politics: Exploring the Link between Sociability and Political Engagement, Online and Off. Journal of Information Technology & Politics, 9(4), pp.402–414. Available at:
Fayolle, A., Gailly, B. & Lassas-Clerc, N., 2006. Assessing the impact of entrepreneurship education programmes: a new methodology. Journal of European Industrial Training, 30(9), pp.701–720.
Fornell, C. & Larcker, D.F., 1981. Evaluating Structural Equation Models with Unobservable Variables and Measurement Error. Journal of Marketing Research, 18(1), pp.39–50.
Fung, A., 2013. Infotopia: Unleashing the Democratic Power of Transparency. Politics & Society, 41(2), pp.183–212. Available at:
Gasco, M., 2014. Special Issue on Open Government: An Introduction. Social Science Computer Review, pp.1–5. Available at:
Geisser, S., 1975. Sample Reuse Method The Predictive with Applications. Journal of the American Statistical Association,, 70(350), pp.320–328.
Gøønbech-Jensen, C., 1998. The Scandinavian tradition of open government and the European Union: problems of compatibility? Journal of European Public Policy, 5:1, pp.185–199.
Grimmelikhuijsen, S., 2012. Linking transparency, knowledge and citizen trust in government: an experiment. International Review of Administrative Sciences, 78(1), pp.50–73.
Grimmelikhuijsen, S.G. & Meijer, A.J., 2014. Effects of transparency on the perceived trustworthiness of a government organization: Evidence from an online experiment. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 24(1), pp.137–157.
Gughwan, C. & Chow, L., 2001. Korean students’ differential attitudes toward people with disabilities: an acculturation perspective. International Journal of Rehabilitation Research, 24, pp.79–81.
Hair, J.F. et al., 2014. A Primer on Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling (PLS-SEM), Thousand Oaks. CA: SAGE.
Hamrick, F. a, 1998. Democratic citizenship and student activism. Journal of College Student Development, 39(5), pp.449–459.
Hansson, K., Belkacem, K. & Ekenberg, L., 2014. Open Government and Democracy: A Research Review. Social Science Computer Review, pp.1–16. Available at:
Hayes, A.F., Preacher, K.J. & Myers, T.A., 2011. Mediation and the Estimation of lndirect Effects in Political Gommunication Research. In E. P. Bucy & R. L. Holbert, eds. Sourcebook for political communication research: Methods, measures, and analytical techniques. New York: Routledge, pp. 434–465.
Henseler, J., Ringle, C.M. & Sinkovics, R.R., 2009. Advances in International Marketing J. Henseler, C. M. Ringle, & R. R. Sinkovics, eds. Advances in International Marketing, 20(2009), pp.277–319.
Hill Mayoral, B.G., Hernández Mata, A. & Dussauge Laguna, M., 2007. Transparencia y acceso a la información pública. In Gobierno Corporativo para el Sector Público’. INFONAVIT y el Centro de Excelencia de Gobierno Corporativo.
Hipkins, R., 2012. The engaging nature of teaching for competency development. In & C. W. Christenson, A. L. Reschly, ed. Handbook of research on stu- dent engagement.
House, W., 2009. Memorandum on Transparency and Open Government., USA. Available at:
Huerta Wong, J.E., 2009. Formación ciudadana y actitudes hacia la participación política en escuelas primarias del noreste de México. Revista Mexicana de Investigación Educativa, 14, pp.121–145. Available at:
Jarvis, C.B., Mackenzie, S.B. & Podsakoff, P.M., 2004. A Critical Review of Construct Indicators and Measurement Model Misspecification in Marketing and Consumer Research. JOURNAL OF CONSUMER RESEARCH, 30(September 2003), pp.199–218.
Jeffres, L.W., Atkin, D. & Neuendorf, K. a., 2002. A Model Linking Community Activity and Communication With Political Attitudes and Involvement in Neighborhoods. Political Communication, 19(4), pp.387–421.
Jonason, P.K., 2014. Personality and politics. Personality and Individual Differences, 71, pp.181–184. Available at:
Kim, Y. & Khang, H., 2014. Revisiting civic voluntarism predictors of college students’ political participation in the context of social media. Computers in Human Behavior, 36, pp.114–121. Available at:
Lawson, M.A. & Lawson, H.A., 2013. New Conceptual Frameworks for Student Engagement Research, Policy, and Practice, Available at:
Lawson, R. a., 2004. Is Classroom Cheating Related to Business Students’ Propensity to Cheat in the “Real World”? Journal of Business Ethics, 49(2), pp.189–199.
Lee, G. & Kwak, Y.H., 2011. An Open Government Implementation Model: Moving to Increased Public Engagement. , pp.1–37.
Linders, Dennis y Copeland Wilson, S., 2011. What is Open Government? One Year after the Directive. In Proceedings of the 12th Annual International Digital Government Research Conference: Digital Government Innovation in Challenging Times. Available at:
Liñán, F. & Chen, Y., 2009. Development and Cross-Cultural Application of a Specific Instrument to Measure Entrepreneurial Intentions. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, pp.593–617.
Di Masso, A., 2012. Grounding Citizenship: Toward a Political Psychology of Public Space. Political Psychology, 33(1), pp.123–143.
McDermott, P., 2010. Building open government. Government Information Quaterly, 27, pp.401–413.
Mehmet, B., 2001. Corruption, connections and transparency: Does a better screen imply a better scene? Public Choice, 107, pp.87–96.
Meijer, a. J., Curtin, D. & Hillebrandt, M., 2012. Open government: connecting vision and voice. International Review of Administrative Sciences, 78(1), pp.10–29.
Metzger, M.W. et al., 2014. The new political voice of young Americans: Online engagement and civic development among first-year college students. Education, Citizenship and Social Justice, 10(1), pp.55–66. Available at:
Ministerio de Educación, 2009. Datos y Cifras del Sistema Universitario Curso 2009/2010. , p.82.
Obama, B., 2007. Connecting and Empowering All Americans through Technology and Innovation., Available at:
Orszag, P.R., 2009. Open Government Directive, USA. Available at:
Pendse, S.G., 2012. Ethical Hazards: A Motive, Means, and Opportunity Approach to Curbing Corporate Unethical Behavior. Journal of Business Ethics, 107(3), pp.265–279. Available at: [Accessed April 25, 2015].
Picón, A., Castro, I. & Roldán, J.L., 2014. The relationship between satisfaction and loyalty: A mediator analysis. Journal of Business Research, 67(5), pp.746–751.
Prat, A., 2006. The more closely we are watched, the better we behave. In D. Hood, C., & Heald, ed. Transparency: The Key to Better Governance?. New York: Oxford University Press, pp. 91–103.
Preacher, K.J. & Hayes, A.F., 2008. Asymptotic and resampling strategies for assessing and comparing indirect effects in multiple mediator models. Behavior Research Methods, 40(3), pp.879–891.
Quintal, V.A., Lee, J.A. & Soutar, G.N., 2010. Risk, uncertainty and the theory of planned behavior: A tourism example. Tourism Management, 31(6), pp.797–805.
RD, P., 2000. Bowling Alone: The Collapse and Renewal of American Community., New York, NY: Simon and Schuster.
Ream, R. K., & Rumberger, R.W., 2008. Student engagement, peer social capital, and school drop-out among Mexican American and non-Latino White students. Sociology of Education, 81, pp.109–139.
Reichert, F., 2014. The prediction of political competencies by political action and political media consumption. Journal of Social Science Education, 13(4), pp.95–114.
Reinikka, R. and Svensson, J., 2003. The power of information: evidence from a newspaper campaign to reduce capture.,
Research Center, P., 2015. Americans’ Views on Open Government Data, Available at:
Rivas, C., Purificación, V. & Sánchez, F., 2010. La educación como elemento de calidad de los políticos latinoamericanos. Política y Gobierno, 17(2), pp.279–319.
Roldán, J.L. & Sánchez-Franco, M.J., 2012. Variance-Based Structural Equation Modeling: Guidelines for Using Partial Least Squares in Information Systems Research. In M. Mora et al., eds. Research Methodologies, Innovations and Philosophies in Software Systems Engineering and Information Systems. Hershey, PA: Information Science Reference, pp. 193–221.
SAHA, L. J. - PRINT, M. - EDWARDS, K., 2007. Youth and Political Participation. K. SAHA, L. J. - PRINT, M. - EDWARDS, ed., Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.
Sanchez, G., Trinchera, L. & Russolillo, G., 2015. Plspm: Tools for Partial Least Squares Path Modeling (PLS-PM). R package version 0.4, 7.
Sánchez-Medina, A.J., Romero-Quintero, L. & Sosa-Cabrera, S., 2014. Environmental management in small and medium-sized companies: an analysis from the perspective of the theory of planned behavior. PloS one, 9(2), p.e88504.
Santos Gómez, M. del C. et al., 1998. Evaluación de las actitudes proambientales en trabajadores de grandes organizaciones. Revista de Psicología Social, 13(3), pp.435–444. Available at:
Senbel, M., Ngo, V.D. & Blair, E., 2014. Social mobilization of climate change: University students conserving energy through multiple pathways for peer engagement. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 38, pp.84–93. Available at:
Sherrod, L. et al., 2001. Citizenship and Education in Twenty-Eight Countries: Civic Knowledge and Engagement at Age Fourteen. International Association for the Evaluation of Educational Achievement (IEA), 23(5), pp.583–587.
Shiel, C. et al., 2015. Evaluating the engagement of universities in capacity building for sustainable development in local communities. Evaluation and Program Planning, 54, pp.123–134. Available at:
Sierra Bravo, R., 1991. Técnicas de investigación social. Teoría y ejercicios, Madrid: Paraninfo.
Silvester, J., Wyatt, M. & Randall, R., 2013. Politician personality, Machiavellianism, and political skill as predictors of performance ratings in political roles. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, pp.258–279.
Skinner, E. A., & Pitzer, J.R., 2012. Developmental dynamics of student engagement, coping, and everyday resilience. In & C. W. (Eds. . S. L. Christenson, A. L. Reschly, ed. Handbook of research on student engagement. New York, NY: Springer, pp. 21–44.
Stone, M., 1974. III Choice and Assessment of Statistical Predictions. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society. Series B (Methodological), 36(2), pp.111–147.
Telefonica, 2014. Global Millennial Survey 2014,
Torney-Purta, J., Barber, C. & Richardson, W.K., 2004. Trust in government related institutions and political engagement among adolescents in six countries. Acta Política, pp.380–406.
Ubaldi, B., 2013. Open Government Data: Towards Empirical Analysis of Open Government Data Initiatives. OECD Working Papers on Public Governance, NO.22(22), p.61. Available at:
Ugarte Artal, Carolina & Naval Durán, C., 2010. La formación política de los alumnos de educación secundaria. Descripción y valoración de programas de service-learning en los estados unidos y la unión europea. Edetania: estudios y propuestas socio-educativas., 37, pp.109–128. Available at:
UNDESA, 2012. E-Government survey 2012: E-Government for the People., New York.
Veciana, J.M. & Urbano, D., 1999. Planteamiento Del Problema Y Objetivos De La Investigación.
Wagner, M., 2008. Obama Election Ushering In First Internet Presidency. Information Week Government. Available at:
Welch, E.W., 2012. The relationship between transparent and participative government: A study of local governments in the United States. International Review of Administrative Sciences, 78(1), pp.93–115.
Whitley, C.T. & Yoder, S.D., 2015. Developing social responsibility and political engagement: Assessing the aggregate impacts of university civic engagement on associated attitudes and behaviors. Education, Citizenship and Social Justice, 10(3), pp.217–233. Available at:
Cómo citar
Caballero Quintana, A., Sánchez Medina, A., & Alonso Hernández, J. B. (2016). Compromiso cívico y actitudes de los universitarios hacia el gobierno abierto. RIESED - Revista Internacional De Estudios Sobre Sistemas Educativos, 2(5), 77-96. Recuperado a partir de